I've just turned in the first 10 (really 12) pages of my thesis, and I'm  feeling excited about this work for the next few months!  I think that I  outlined my argument pretty well, stated why this project is important,  and even managed to define and not-define affect to my liking at this  stage in the game.
 So, now that I've been able to put words around my general ideas and  make the necessary connections between subjectivity, technology, and  citizenship, I'm about to delve into these issues more deeply.   One thing that I came across this week is  this statement by James McGovern, representative from Massachusetts (and American University alumnus): "I believe hunger is a political condition. We have the  means to solve hunger in America once and for all, but we haven’t  mustered the political will to do so. Shame on us for not doing more to  end this terrible scourge."  I  came across this as I was confirming my graduation date and time  because James McGovern is meant to be one of our commencement speakers.   So, I checked  out his website to see what he is all about and found this statement in  response to the current debates around Food Stamps. Of course, I found  an immediate connection  with my thesis because this is what I think about 90% of the time  nowadays.
 Basically, the argument that I am trying to progress in my thesis is  that human needs and desires -- physical and bodily needs as well as  spiritual and metaphysical needs -- are not separate mind/body needs, but holistic human needs and they are bound up in issues of  citizenship.  The issue of hunger in this country, especially poignant as the country is also plagued  by severe obesity, is only one example of this relationship.  By looking  to address hunger as a singular issue, I believe that politics will  continue to fail American citizens because hunger, for me, is not a  singular issue and cannot be addressed simply with food stamps.   Obviously, food stamps is a necessary program that will alleviate some  of that -- providing food stamps is an essential program, in my  opinion, and I fail to understand how people who claim to have values can debate against this program.  But what I mean is that we all know that hunger stems from  much more than just lack of food.  I think it stems from all sorts of  structural inequalities from unemployment to racism.  Anyway, I guess my  point that I'm working out right now is something about how addressing  poverty as a purely bodily need and not as a bigger issue perpetuates  the structural inequalities that lead to hunger in the first place.   
 And Science Fiction as a genre is eerily spot on about this assessment.   It's crazy to look at Sci Fi novels from the 1990's that warn against  the increased use and distribution of pharmaceutical drugs, for example,  and to see how many of those fears are playing out today.  So, I'm  taking my cues from Octavia Butler here to learn more about this  connection as opposed to the history of political theory or whatever its  called.   
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.