...is hard in a standardized test.
It's been a rough week.  A lot of unexpected things have happened in a time when I only have barely enough time for the things that are already happening.  I have no room for error right now, and there's been a lot of error this week.
I keep thinking--frankly obsessing--over errors as I work toward a successful GRE subject exam this weekend.  It's an enormously frustrating thing.  I figured that if I bring my frustration to bear on my community of friends who read my blog, perhaps sharing and diffusing my pains will make it all feel a little better.  And maybe you will find this interesting.
Of all of the annoyances of the GRE, I can think of at least two things it has done for me over the past week of cramming:
1) I learned that marching to the beat of your own drum comes from Henry David Thoreau's Walden (1843): "If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.  Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away."  Now, of course, it is riddled with white patriarchal language.  But now I know where it comes from, and I do like the sentiment.
2) I read Doctor Faustus by Christopher Marlowe (1616), which is an excellent story.  My cynicism says that Marlowe will show up on the exam in the form of "The Passionate Shepherd to his Love," which I'm not sure I will recognize.  But hey, at least I had a moment of pleasure in the midst of my studying.
And now, for my moment of optimism, I will share my top two frustrations lest you all think that I actually value this test or the time it is taking me to study for it (which is time that I am taken away from PhD applications, writing sample, statement of purpose, homework, household duties, social time, etc. etc.):
1) Who the hell needs to know about Robert Herrick's "Julia Poems"?  Herrick is apparently a "cavalier poet" who is one seriously lustful man.  In a poem called "Cherry-ripe" he talks about...take a guess?  Her lips.  He even writes about her clothes: "WHENAS in silks my Julia goes,/Then, then, methinks, how sweetly flows/That liquefaction of her clothes./Next, when I cast mine eyes and see/That brave vibration each way free ;/O how that glittering taketh me!"  Is this really literature?  Me thinks not. 
2) Thomas Carlyle.  What?  You've never heard of him?  That's because he wrote one thing, Sartor Resartus (the tailor re-tailored) in 1833, that was barely publishable then and certainly wouldn't be now.   The main character, Professor Teufelsdrockh, ponders "the philosophy of clothes."  I cannot understand why this shabby piece is considered part of the cannon and the majority of 20th century literature that most of learn is not on this damned exam.
What's a student to do with this ridiculous form of testing literature?  Did someone say bunburying?